OBLYTECH Logo
Enquire Now
OBLYTECH Logo

OBLYTECH / ServiceNow

Enhancing ServiceNow Reporting: Solutions to Common Challenges 

Following these well-honed tactics can help you overcome ServiceNow reporting obstacles: 

For readers evaluating this topic and deciding what to review next.

ServiceNow reportingServiceNowpractical guide
Discuss this topic

Guide map

A practical framework for servicenow reporting.

1. Clarify Reporting Needs

Reporting problems usually start with unclear questions, not with the tooling.

2. Use Pre-built Reports

Each report should answer one question for one audience.

3. Tailor Dashboards

Good reporting is a maintained practice rather than a one-time build.

The practical framework

Following these well-honed tactics can help you overcome ServiceNow reporting obstacles: 

1. Clarify Reporting Needs

Identify the data that must be included in reports and understand the KPIs that are in accordance with the goals of the company. 

 

2. Use Pre-built Reports

Start by utilizing ServiceNow’s pre-built dashboards and reports to save time and gain insightful information. You may then modify them to meet your individual needs. 

 

3. Tailor Dashboards

Make dashboards specific to various user roles so that pertinent insights are sent to each stakeholder based on their roles and responsibilities. 

 

4. Use Performance Analytics

Take advantage of ServiceNow’s Performance Analytics to explore more in-depth reporting, which allows for the examination of patterns and trends using indicators and breakdowns.   

5. Utilize Visualizations

To improve accessibility and comprehension, present data in an efficient manner by incorporating a range of visual components, such as charts and graphs. 

 

6. Automate Reporting

Arrange for reports to be prepared and sent automatically on a regular basis. This way, changes may be sent to stakeholders on time and without human intervention. 

 

7. Maintain Data Accuracy

Verify data on a regular basis to ensure that it is accurate and full. This will help to avoid drawing incorrect conclusions and guarantee the validity of insights drawn from reports. 

 

8. Focus Reports on Key Metrics

Make reports more concise by highlighting important metrics and insights. This will help users avoid being overwhelmed with information and concentrate on the things that really matter. 

 

9. Strategically Filter Data

Use filters to hone down on the information that is presented, giving you tailored insights into particular business areas and facilitating more deliberate decision-making. 10. Offer Contextual Explanations: Make reports more user-friendly by providing context-specific explanations to help users comprehend the data and how it relates to their responsibilities. 

 

10. Track Report Usage

Keep an eye on how reports are being used to get insightful information about the preferences and behaviour of users. This will allow reporting techniques to be continuously improved and refined. 

 

11. Continually Evaluate and Improve Reports

Maintain flexibility by regularly evaluating and revising reports to correspond with changing priorities and needs within the organization. 

 

12. Invest in User Training

Give users thorough instruction on ServiceNow reporting features and best practices so they may maximize the benefits of their reporting endeavors and take full advantage of the platform’s capabilities.  

 

Organizations can more effectively use ServiceNow’s reporting capabilities to guide decision-making and expedite the accomplishment of their business goals by putting these improved techniques into practice. 

Common questions

Questions teams ask about servicenow reporting

What should a review establish first?

Start with the question, scope, decision boundary, ownership, and evidence that the reader needs to carry into the next action.

How should the next action be chosen?

Use the article framework to identify the unresolved decision, the responsible group, and the record that will show what happened.

The documented boundary

This article is presented as a practical reference. Apply its recommendations against the specific systems, responsibilities, and evidence available in the organization being reviewed.

Start from the decision a report has to change

A report earns its place when someone reads it and does something different because of it. Before anyone opens a report builder, the owner should be able to name the decision, the person who makes it, how often it comes up, and what that person would do if the number moved. A supervisor who reassigns work each morning needs a different view from a service owner who reviews performance at a monthly governance meeting. When those two needs are merged into one dashboard, both readers scroll past the figures they care about, and the report gets blamed for a design problem that started with the request.

The same test tells you what to leave out. A measure that changes no decision is trivia, and it should be removed or kept as a personal list. Teams that skip this step end up with a page of widgets that only two people open. Fewer outputs with clear owners are easier to keep accurate, and accuracy is what makes people trust the platform’s numbers in the first place. A broader survey of reporting options sits in the reporting and analytics guide; this section concentrates on the design decision that comes before any of them.

Match the output to the question being asked

ServiceNow can show the same underlying records in several ways. Each option has a different build cost, a different load on the instance and a different maintenance burden. The table is a starting point for the design conversation rather than a rule book.

Question the reader is askingOutput that usually fitsWhat to check before building it
Which records are open right now, and who holds each one?A list report with a saved filter, grouped by assignment groupConfirm which states the team counts as work. Cancelled or pending-customer records often need a deliberate decision
Is the backlog aging over several weeks?A Performance Analytics indicator with a time series and breakdownsTrend history generally begins when collection starts unless historical data is deliberately collected. A new indicator may have no past, so a first chart can look flat for the wrong reason
Which requests need a nudge today?A scheduled report sent to a group or a fixed list of recipientsRecipients may see only the records their roles allow, so a shared mailbox may get a thinner list than the owner expects
Where is the team stuck this week?A role-specific dashboard, each widget linked to its underlying listA widget with no drill-down starts arguments about totals that nobody can trace back to records

Two rows in that table deserve extra care. Performance Analytics earns its cost when the question is about direction over time, not about the current state. Using it to show a single number that a list report could show is an expensive way to answer a simple question, and every indicator adds collection work to the instance. When the question needs data joined from several platforms, the business intelligence work is a different tool with different costs and should be chosen on purpose.

Why two reports give different totals

Most reporting disputes are not arguments about the platform. They are arguments about definitions that were never written down. One report counts incidents by the date they were opened, another by the date they were resolved, and a third uses the last update, which moves every time someone adds a work note. Time zones add a second layer, because a list shows dates in the viewer’s time zone while a filter can be written against values stored in a different time zone. Reassignments add a third, since a ticket that moved between groups may appear in two groups’ counts depending on how the report groups it.

A reconciliation procedure settles most of these disputes quickly. It works best when the owner runs it before anyone promises a figure to a steering group.

  1. Write the question in one sentence, including the date field that defines the period.
  2. Build the simplest possible list with exactly those conditions and no grouping, and count the rows it returns.
  3. Compare that count with each disputed report, listing the filters, the group-by fields and the date field each one uses.
  4. Pick one definition, record it in the report description, and retire or rename any report that answers a different question under the same name.
  5. Sample five or six records by hand and confirm that each one falls in the same place in every report. A matching total can hide two errors that cancel each other out.

What usually goes wrong after the first build

A report that was correct on the day it was built drifts over time, and the drift is rarely dramatic. The failure modes below show up again and again in instances that have run for a while.

  • Filters that reference a field whose meaning changed, such as a category list that was reorganized without anyone updating the reports that depended on it.
  • Saved reports owned by a person who has left, so nobody knows who may change the filter when a number starts to look wrong.
  • Widgets added to a shared dashboard by different people, each with a slightly different idea of what counts as a closed record.
  • Scheduled emails that keep going to a distribution list that no longer matches the team it was meant to serve.
  • Performance Analytics breakdowns that were never reviewed after a new assignment group or service was introduced, so new work appears under an “other” bucket that grows without anyone noticing.

The common thread is ownership, the same question raised in workflow ownership. Each saved report, dashboard and indicator needs a named owner, a short written definition and a review point. The review does not need to be elaborate. It needs to happen on a fixed cycle, and it needs someone with authority to change or retire an output that no longer answers a live question.

When a new report is the wrong fix

Some reporting problems are not reporting problems. If the team cannot agree on when an incident is resolved, a new dashboard will simply display the disagreement more clearly. If records are entered inconsistently, the report will faithfully show poor data. If nobody acts on the figures, the report is an audit trail of inaction. In those cases the useful next step is a process decision, a data standard or an ownership change, and the report can follow once that decision exists.

Designing a dashboard around the measures, context, thresholds and ownership a defined audience needs is covered in monitoring dashboard decision design. It is also worth resisting a request for a real-time view when the decision happens weekly. A daily scheduled summary is often easier to trust and cheaper to run than a live dashboard that people check once a week and misread the rest of the time.

How many reports should one team maintain?

There is no universal number. A useful test is whether the team can name the purpose of every saved report and say when it was last checked. If the answer is no for a large share of them, the estate is too big to govern, and retiring the unused outputs is a better investment than building replacements.

Should a dashboard show targets next to actuals?

It should, when the target was agreed with the people who will read the figure. A target that nobody owns invites the wrong conversation. Show the target, the period it applies to and the owner who set it, so the reader knows whether a gap is a performance question or a question about the target itself.

Why does a new trend line look incomplete?

Because the history generally starts when the data was first collected, not when the business goal was written. Label the start date on the chart. Then nobody mistakes a short history for a stable pattern, and nobody assumes data exists from before collection began.

Who should be allowed to change a shared filter?

The owner of the question the filter answers, not every user with edit access. Keep edit rights narrow, record the reason for each change in the description, and tell the people who receive the report when a definition changes.

Where the reporting design goes from here

If your reports disagree with each other and you are not sure which definition the business actually needs, a short review of the questions, owners and data sources can often resolve more than another round of widget changes. Tell us which decisions your current reports are meant to support through the contact page, or look at the wider ServiceNow services for how reporting fits into platform governance.

A practical next step

Need a clearer operating model?

OBLYTECH can discuss the questions raised by this guide and the next review step. Use the OBLYTECH contact route to start the conversation.

Useful starting pointBring the current question, scope, ownership concerns, and evidence needs into the first review conversation.

Explore OBLYTECH services

ServiceNow guides on this topic

Guides from the Oblytech ServiceNow library that explain the practice behind this page.

More from the blog

Related reading