AI governance
AI governance, risk, and controls should make approved use, data access, human oversight, evaluation, audit evidence, exceptions, security, and review explicit.
State the use case, users, decision supported, prohibited actions, accountable owner, approval authority, and conditions that require re-review.
The AI consulting and implementation route provides an internal path when controls must become part of delivery.
Record data sources, permitted purpose, access roles, sensitive fields, retention responsibility, tool permissions, and external actions.
Define the evaluation question, reviewer, acceptance condition, escalation path, and disablement decision. Human oversight must identify what the reviewer can change, reject, or stop.
Retain approvals, evaluation results, material changes, incidents, challenged outputs, exceptions, and decisions.
Revisit controls when data, model, prompt, tool, workflow, user group, integration, or consequence changes.
Human review is not enough by itself. The reviewer needs authority, context, time, evidence, and a clear action when the output is wrong or uncertain.
Bring the AI use case, data boundary, or exception path that needs a reviewable control model.
Discuss AI governance